- In Focus -
SONOPP's June Newsletter, 2006 |
Calendar
of Events
MONTHLY MEETINGS
Fourth Monday of each month
Quality Inn at Bagley & Engle
7230 Engle Road
Middleburg Hts., OH 44130
Cocktails at 6:30 p.m.
Dinner at 7:30 p.m.
June 26
Installation Meeting
July 24
Rob Ledwedge
Studio Backgrounds |
President's Message
This
is my last official president’s message. It has been an honor and a
privilege to have served as your president for the past year.
I hope you will support the incoming officers and board
members. We have two new board members, Terry Biacsi and Dale Kincaid, and
I’m sure they will bring fresh, new ideas with them.
The 26th of June is our annual Installation
Dinner and 57th Anniversary Celebration. So please plan to
attend and take part in this important event. It will be held at the Plaza
Hotel – Cleveland Airport, formerly the Quality Inn & Suites where we hold
our regular meetings – but we will be in Ballroom #1. So get your
reservations in and I’ll see you there. |
|
Also, don’t forget your membership renewals; Bob Neldon
is working on a great lineup of speakers for the coming year, so don’t miss
out.
Carol Combs, SONOPP President 2005 -
2006 |
|
In This Issue
|
July 24 Meeting
Studio Backgrounds, by Rob Ledwedge
|
How to make your portrait studio fun and
efficient
-
Is your studio atmosphere comfortable?
-
Is your studio fun?
-
Is your camera room efficient?
-
Is your client's experience memorable?
Rob will enlighten the importance of the background in your
portraits. He will show you how to design your camera room with painted
muslin and canvas backgrounds along with 'sets' to appeal to every personality
that walks into your studio. He will go over some easy, economic and
efficient ways to you to build your own backgrounds and sets. And how to
hang your muslin and canvas backgrounds. He will explain how your studio's
atmosphere will effect you, and your client's performance. The first step
to capturing a great portrait starts with your client being comfortable, not
nervous and uneasy. And don't forget... Let's have fun! |
|
| The Photoshop
Corner |
 The Unsharp Mask is the tool most often used to sharpen an
image that is a little softer than the retoucher wants. The Unsharp
Mask dialog has three adjustable sliders: Amount, Radius, and Threshold.
(We won't discuss Threshold here.)
Most books recommend an Amount of 100-200% or greater, and a
Radius in the vicinity of 1-2. The result can be seen in the upper
right image, and is quite typical.
There is a little-known variant of the Unsharp Mask,
however, which uses an Amount of ~20% and a large radius, ~100 px. The
effect of these settings is to produce more of a change in contrast than a
change in sharpness. (I typically reduce the effect using the
Edit/Fade tool at 50%, as seen on the lower left image.)
The final image (lower right) shows the result of combining
these two variations of the Unsharp Mask. (I use them individually so
much that I
have made actions for each.)
|
|
|
Commentary
Last month's newsletter featured an article by Patrick Rice,
deploring the present state of professionalism in our industry, specifically
the use of photojournalism at weddings. (If you haven't read it yet,
click here.)
His article (published in two other newsletters as well)
prompted some responses. Here's one from our very own Chuck Humbert:
Pat, I commend your interpretation
on the movement in Professional Photography.
I remember in the mid fifties when
the trend to have 'Formal Portraits' done on location at outdoor settings
began. This led to photographers, working out of their homes, being able to
book weddings without having an 'In Studio Shooting Room'. That was
the start of the movement for anyone with a camera to be able to cover
weddings.
Now with the advent of digital
photography and quality inkjet printing I noticed another change. Last
month at the SONOPP meeting the speaker mentioned that he sold 8x10's for
$10.00 each. Wow! When I closed Humbert Studio three years ago I
was selling 8x10's for $59.00. Times apparently have changed.
Where it will lead I do not know.
Your thoughts as published in the
SONOPP newsletter are very appropriate. It is something that we all must be
aware of.
Where have all the shoemakers and
TV repairman gone?
Can we innovate and create a new
market?
We must come up with a new product
that requires our professional skills.
Bringing this up at the National
Level will not help. Our once-professional organizations now consist
of anyone with a camera who is willing to pay the dues. The
professional organizations have become 'Large Businesses' in themselves,
with big money going to the upper echelon. They even publish
magazines, again for big bucks. In addition many of our fine
photographers have joined the speakers circuit, putting on seminars for
large fees.
Now, here I am just rambling on and
not really adding anything to your eloquent epistle. I just had to let
you know that you have been heard and that your thoughts are timely.
Another response came from Paul Foreman of
www.captivatingimagesphotography.com:
WOW! that was a great article your
wrote for "Lens". I made similar comments on Monte Zucker's Forum and I got
blasted into the next country!
Everything you said is VERY true,
in spite of what the wannabe Denis Regie's and Gary Fong's say. There
are a lot of brides & grooms and their families that hired a
photojournalist, and they will not know it now, BUT 20 years from now
they will wonder why they do not have any portraits from their wedding.
I have all but "GIVEN UP" weddings. There are so many PJ shooters who
give away the CD here you practically have to crawl over them to get inside
a church or reception area.
GREAT ARTICLE !
So, has anyone got a contrary opinion? A defense of photojournalism at
weddings? Is there a place for it?
|
|
|