The Society of Northern Ohio Professional Photographers
|
||||||||||||||
Okay, now we're ready to un-wrinkle. But should we really use Gaussian Blur? What about Median Noise instead? Why? you ask. Good question. Let's see the difference:
Notice that by using Gaussian Blur you're actually moving the blue that's in the background into the skin area. This is of course something we want to avoid at all cost. So, from the menu bar select Filter / Noise / Median..., enter a radius of 10 pixels, and click OK. The skin will look just fine, but we've blurred areas that need to stay sharp, like eyes, lips, hair, eyebrows, eyelashes, and the edges of the nose and nostrils. As usual, you add a mask and paint (in the mask) with black to let the original (sharp) features show through. You can apply a final sharpen at this point; we did it with another Ctrl + Shift + Alt + E layer and our usual sharpening technique (see One-Click Sharpening). Here's what our Layers palette looks like,
with the thumbnail size enlarged (Palette Options) so you can see the mask. And here's the final image:
Run your mouse over the image to see the original. Look particularly at the forehead, the cheeks, and the chin and neck. You may prefer not to have hair sharpened this much, and you can certainly mask it out. But other features, particularly the eyes and jewelry, should certainly be sharpened after the smoothing. Finally, note that much of this article is spent on getting ready. The actual smoothing is very fast, requiring just a few clicks and the masking. (We've talked about this technique before, smoothing using Median Noise; see Neat Noise. There we used a 13-pixel radius.) Do try it -- you'll like it!
| ||||||||||||||